Throughout the world, young men and women are expected to pay a political and social price of showing loyalty to their governments by serving in the military. The concept of mandatory military service, often referred to as a draft, is not uncommon and has been used by many countries across the globe. However, there are many who use various methods to avoid being drafted into service, instead choosing to pursue other options. This practice, known as draft dodging, is a contentious issue, with some believing those who evade the draft are selfish, while others maintain that they should be commended for making well-informed decisions. So, should we be upset at those who “dodged the draft”?
In order to properly answer this question, it is first important to understand why people choose to dodge the draft. The primary reason why individuals decide to avoid military service is simply to protect their own lives. Military service is not an easy thing to do and, in certain cases, can prove to be dangerous. To some, this means that the potential costs of enlisting outweigh the potential benefits. For example, the Vietnam War saw a significant rise in the number of draft dodgers, largely because many were opposed to the war and were unwilling to become involved. Similarly, in the United States, the draft of 1864 saw many simply avoid conscription because they lacked the resources to pay for a substitute. Therefore, the decision to dodge the draft often stems from a desire to protect oneself, whether for ideological or financial reasons.
It is also important to understand the consequences of draft dodging. Those who choose to evade conscription can be subjected to various levels of punishment. In some countries, such as the United States, draft dodging is considered a criminal offense and those found guilty face both fines and prison time. Other countries are not as lenient. For instance, in Greece, failing to present yourself for military service is considered a felony and offenders can be sentenced to up to two years in prison. Therefore, it is clear that the act of draft dodging is not an insignificant one and those choosing to do so should expect to face some sort of repercussion.
Controversy has arisen over whether or not those who dodge the draft should be shamed and viewed negatively by the public. Many believe that those who choose to evade military service are selfish and undeserving of respect, which they argue is a disservice to those who chose to serve instead. After all, serving one’s country is seen as a noble act, so why should draft dodgers be exonerated for simply not wanting to do so? There is certainly a valid argument to be made here, as those who dodge the draft are not paying their fair share and, in some cases, can put the rest of their country at risk.
At the same time, some believe that draft dodgers should not be condemned. This argument points out that, ultimately, the decision to dodge the draft is a deeply personal one and should be respected. For example, those opposed to certain wars may feel morally opposed to participating in them and serve as a form of conscientious objection. Furthermore, it could be argued that those who dodge the draft are actually doing their country a service by avoiding potential conflicts. After all, having fewer people involved in the military can lead to fewer casualties and create a lasting peace. Therefore, it is important to consider both sides of the argument when discussing whether draft dodgers should be seen in a negative light.
Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to be upset at those who dodge the draft is one that is highly subjective and complex. While it is understandable to be angered at those who choose to forgo service, it is also important to consider the motivations behind their actions. Some may have sound reasons for avoiding conscription, while others may simply do it out of selfishness. Whatever the reason, it is clear that the act of draft dodging is a contentious one and requires a deeper level of understanding before judgment can be passed.